COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ONLINE LEARNING TO TRADITIONAL LEARNING FORMATS Is online learning effective? Photo credit: Maureen Rose • When an online course is properly designed and conducted, learning outcomes are not significantly different from those produced in a traditional, face-to-face classroom setting. (USDOE, 2010) Questions • What does effective mean? • How do they measure it? • In all disciplines? • Academic? Vocational? • Practical? Conceptual? Literature Review Papers Reviewed 31 Papers Research • Compared f2f with online • Peer reviewed journals • Range of fields • Practical and theoretical Excluded: Studies where online pedagogy was not used. 10 countries Variety of Disciplines Disciplines • Social work • Medical Laboratory • Education: preschool science students media • SQL Course teachers • Leadership Studies • Health Studies • Sociology • Speech Pathology and Dentistry • Finance • Language teaching: Spanish, Dutch, English • Engineering (math courses) • Business students • Math • Nursing • Economics • Hospitality • Sociology • Business School • Vocational Training: • Dental hygiene • Macroeconomics Findings Academic Performance Student Satisfaction Four Major Themes BENEFITS OF ONLINE EDUCATION STUDENT SATISFACTION INTERACTION ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE Flexibility Benefits of Online Real World Application Digital Skills Cost Effective F2f comparable to online Student Satisfaction Negative: Technical glitches Feeling isolated Workload higher than expected Student to Content Interaction Student to Student Student to Teacher Academic Performance • Comparable • Student Characteristics and Choice Comparing the Effectiveness on Online Learning to Traditional Learning Formats: Is Online Learning Effective? References 1. Afrouz, R., & Crisp, B. R. (2020). Online education in social work, effectiveness, benefits, and challenges: A scoping review. Australian Social Work. 2. Archana V. Hegde & Brittany S. Hewett (2020) Examining effectiveness of online teaching modules on Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP) for guiding young children’s behavior: student and instructor perspectives, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, DOI: 10.1080/10901027.2020.1781714 3. Aggarwal R, Gupte N, Kass N, Taylor H, Ali J, Bhan A, et al. (2011). A comparison of online versus on-site training in health research methodology: a randomized study. BMC Medical Education, 11, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-37 4. Arias, J. J., Swinton, J., & Anderson, K. (2018). Online vs. Face-to-Face: A Comparison of Student Outcomes with Random Assignment. E-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 12(2), 1–23. 5. Bains M, Reynolds PA, McDonald F & Sherriff M. (2011). Effectiveness and acceptability of faceto-face, blended and e-learning: a randomised trial of orthodontic undergraduates. European Journal of Dental Education, 15, 110-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00651.x 6. Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcome and Satisfaction in Online Learning during the Pandemic of COVID19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 285–292. 7. Bosshardt, W., & Chiang, E. P. (2016). Lecture capture learning: Do students perform better compared to face-to-face classes? Southern Economic Journal, 82(3), 1021-1038. 8. Blau, G., & Kapanjie, D. (2016). Correlates of business undergraduates' perceived favorability of online compared to face-to-face courses. Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness, 6(1), 50-66. doi:10.5325/jasseinsteffe.6.1.0050 9. Bir, D. D. (2019). Comparison of Academic Performance of Students in Online vs. Traditional Engineering Course. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 22(1), 1–13. 10. Birkeland, K., Weinandt, M., & Carr, D. L. (2015). Student Outcomes in Economics Principles: Online vs. Face-to-Face Delivery. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 11(2), 41–50. 11. Chen, K.-Z., Lowenthal, P. R., & Bauer, C. (2016). Effectiveness and Student Perceptions of HighEnrolment Health Studies Online Courses. Health Education Journal, 75(3), 343–357. Jacquie Harrison Feb. 26, 2021 12. Chuang, H.-H., Weng, C.-Y., & Chen, C.-H. (2018). Which Students Benefit Most from a Flipped Classroom Approach to Language Learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 56– 68. 13. de Paepe, L. (2018). Student Performance in Online and Face-to-Face Second Language Courses: Dutch L2 in Adult Education. Journal of Educational Sciences, 19, 66–76. 14. Donkin R, Askew E & Stevenson H. (2019). Video feedback and e-Learning enhances laboratory skills and engagement in medical laboratory science students. BMC Medical Education, 19, 310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1745-1 15. Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (2011). A course is a course is a course: Factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face-to-face learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 236-241. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.003 16. Enkin, E., & Mejías‐Bikandi, E. (2017). The effectiveness of online teaching in an advanced Spanish language course. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 176-197. doi:10.1111/ijal.12112 17. Fendler, R. J., Ruff, C., & Shrikhande, M. M. (2018). No Significant Difference--Unless You Are a Jumper. Online Learning, 22(1), 39–60. 18. Jurewitsch, B. (2012). A Meta-Analytic and Qualitative Review of Online versus Face-to-Face Problem-Based Learning. Journal of Distance Education, 26(2). 19. Krämer, B. J., Neugebauer, J., Magenheim, J., & Huppertz, H. (2015). New Ways of Learning: Comparing the Effectiveness of Interactive Online Media in Distance Education with the European Textbook Tradition. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 965–971. 20. Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., Karpinski, A. C., & Singh, S. (2019). College students’ multitasking behavior in online versus face-to-face courses. SAGE Open, 9(1), 215824401882450. doi:10.1177/2158244018824505 21. Lopez Soblechero MV, Gonzalez Gaya C & Hernandez Ramirez JJ. (2014). A comparative study of classroom and online distance modes of official vocational education and training. PLoS ONE [Electronic Resource], 9, e96052. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096052 22. Manning-Ouellette, A., & Black, K. M. (2017). Learning Leadership: A Qualitative Study on the Differences of Student Learning in Online versus Traditional Courses in a Leadership Studies Program. Journal of Leadership Education, 16(2), 59–79. 23. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R. F., & Baki, M. (2013). The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3). Jacquie Harrison Feb. 26, 2021 24. McCall, M., Spencer, E., Owen, H., Roberts, N., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Characteristics and Efficacy of Digital Health Education: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Health Education Journal, 77(5), 497–514. 25. Moazami F, Bahrampour E, Azar MR, Jahedi F & Moattari M. (2014). Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: a post-test only design study. BMC Medical Education, 14, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-45 26. O'Flaherty JA & Laws TA. (2014). Nursing student's evaluation of a virtual classroom experience in support of their learning Bioscience. Nurse Education in Practice, 14, 654-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.07.004 27. Ramos, J. S., da Silva, L. K., Pinzan, A., de Castro Rodrigues, A., & Berretin-Felix, G. (2015). Distance Learning: Effectiveness of an Interdisciplinary Course in Speech Pathology and Dentistry. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 11, 101–121. 28. Sagheb-Tehrani, M. (2011). Distance Learning: An Empirical Study. Information Systems Education Journal, 9(1), 41–52. 29. Sellnow-Richmond, D., Strawser, M. G., & Sellnow, D. D. (2020). Student Perceptions of Teaching Effectiveness and Learning Achievement: A Comparative Examination of Online and Hybrid Course Delivery Format. Communication Teacher, 34(3), 248–263. 30. Soffer, T., & Nachmias, R. (2018). Effectiveness of learning in online academic courses compared with face‐to‐face courses in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 534–543. 31. Sussman, S., & Dutter, L. (2010). Comparing Student Learning Outcomes in Face-to-Face and Online Course Delivery. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(4). 32. Van den Broeck, L., De Laet, T., Lacante, M., Pinxten, M., Van Soom, C., & Langie, G. (2020). The Effectiveness of a MOOC in Basic Mathematics and Time Management Training for Transfer Students in Engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(4), 534–549. 33. Weldy, T. G. (2018). Traditional, Blended, or Online: Business Student Preferences and Experience with Different Course Formats. E-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 12(2), 55–62. 34. Wuellner, M. R. (2013). Student Learning and Instructor Investment in Online and Face-to-Face Natural Resources Courses. Natural Sciences Education, 42(1), 14–23. 35. Yavuzarslan, M., Olgun, H., & Yazici, S. (2019). A Pilot Study on the Comparison between Blended and F2F Learning Methods in a SQL Course. Online Submission, 2, 17–25. Jacquie Harrison Feb. 26, 2021 Jacquie Harrison Feb. 26, 2021